lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted
    On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 09:31:54AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > > > @@ -392,8 +392,11 @@ int ipcperms (struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp
    > > > granted_mode >>= 3;
    > > > /* is there some bit set in requested_mode but not in granted_mode? */
    > > > if ((requested_mode & ~granted_mode & 0007) &&
    > > > - !capable(CAP_IPC_OWNER))
    > > > - return -1;
    > > > + !capable(CAP_IPC_OWNER)) {
    > > > + if (!can_do_mlock()) {
    > > > + return -1;
    > > > + }
    > > > + }
    > >
    > > I still don't see the use for this one. I believe it duplicates
    > > SHM_HUGETLB check that's already there.
    >
    > I'm not sure about your comments here. However, I'm also not
    > quite sure about this piece of code. Arjan ? ;)

    hmmm looks bullshit now that I look at it again.

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:3.075 / U:0.060 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site