Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 31 Aug 2004 15:36:49 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] kill __always_inline |
| |
Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> wrote: > > An issue that we already discussed at 2.6.8-rc2-mm2 times: > > 2.6.9-rc1 includes __always_inline which was formerly in -mm. > __always_inline doesn't make any sense: > > __always_inline is _exactly_ the same as __inline__, __inline and inline . > > > The patch below removes __always_inline again:
But what happens if we later change `inline' so that it doesn't do the `always inline' thing?
An explicit usage of __always_inline is semantically different than boring old `inline'. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |