lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject2.6.9-rc1-mm2: why is DIGIEPCA marked BROKEN?
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:54:26PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.9-rc1-mm1:
>...
> +mark-pcxx-as-broken.patch
>
> Dead driver
>...

<-- snip -->

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

It's already marked BROKEN_ON_SMP, but even a UP compile yields tons of
errors. While those aren't deeply complicated to fix having them for over
a year now is a pretty good indicator no one cares.

<-- snip -->


If I revert mark-pcxx-as-broken.patch, the driver compiles UP for me
with exactly zero errors or warnings.

@Christoph:
Could you post the errors you observed?


cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:2.053 / U:0.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site