[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [rfc][patch] DRM initial function table support.
    On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 09:07:11AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
    > I think the intention is to have default functions set in the
    > device-independent code and have the device-dependent code over-ride
    > them. Since the defaults may not always be NULL, doing a struct like
    > that wouldn't really work. I suppose we could have a struct and a
    > device-independent function that copies the non-NULL pointers from the
    > per-device struct. Would that be better?

    Don't copy them. Just put

    if (foo->ops->method1)

    in your code. It's an additional branch, but you avoid the indirect
    functioncalloverhead in exchange.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.019 / U:1.148 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site