Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 3 Aug 2004 23:38:57 +0200 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted |
| |
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:36:34PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:13:39PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > The user that mlock'd gets to pay for it, and gets his credits back at > > munlock. Chown doesn't really matter in that regard..... The thing that does > > what? he cannot get credits when it munlock if this is hugetlbfs. If it > does you're again into the insecure DoS scenario.
not if you keep track of who locked in the first place and give the credit back to *that* user (struct). [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |