Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 28 Aug 2004 13:22:55 +0200 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: reiser4 plugins (was: silent semantic changes with reiser4) |
| |
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 03:18:07PM +0400, Alexander Lyamin wrote: > Yes, I think it would be nice to have this infrastructure in VFS. Technically. > But its not possible, cause of "committee clusterfuck". Socially. Stupidly.
Please explain your problems. I've not seen a single actually working proposal yet. Current reiser4 implementation apparently oopses and breaks guaranteed fs semantics, it's not going in in either reiser4 or the vfs.
Al has started a thread to hash out working semantics, but there's not been a single namesys person involved. Similar all of you have absolutely ignore every single technical question or comment but started a flamefest consisting mostly of personal attacs and "mine is longer" politics. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |