lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others)
Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 21:19, spaminos-ker@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>>--- Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Is this an SMP machine? There were problems with that version of the
>>>voluntary preemption patches on SMP. The latest version, Q3, should fix
>>>these.
>>>
>>
>>No, it's a single CPU Athlon 1800+, the kernel is compiled in with support for
>>SMP system, but that should not have any impact.
>>
>
>
> I believe people were also having problems running SMP kernels with the
> VP patches on UP. Try the latest version. Q3 as of this writing.

Nicolas,
I'll generate a combined patch and let you know when it's ready. In
the mean time, could you try increasing the "base_promotion_interval" to
about twice the time slice size?

Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans