[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others)
    Lee Revell wrote:
    > On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 21:19, wrote:
    >>--- Lee Revell <> wrote:
    >>>Is this an SMP machine? There were problems with that version of the
    >>>voluntary preemption patches on SMP. The latest version, Q3, should fix
    >>No, it's a single CPU Athlon 1800+, the kernel is compiled in with support for
    >>SMP system, but that should not have any impact.
    > I believe people were also having problems running SMP kernels with the
    > VP patches on UP. Try the latest version. Q3 as of this writing.

    I'll generate a combined patch and let you know when it's ready. In
    the mean time, could you try increasing the "base_promotion_interval" to
    about twice the time slice size?

    Peter Williams

    "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
    -- Ambrose Bierce

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.024 / U:31.168 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site