[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: silent semantic changes with reiser4
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 11:09:38AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Comments? Does anybody hate "openat()" for any reason (regardless of
> attributes)? We can easily support it, we'd just need to pass in the file
> to use as part of the "nameidata" thing or add an argument (it would also
> possibly be cleaner if we made "fs->pwd" be a "struct file").

What would your openat() produce? Normal struct file? Then what's going
to be its vfsmount/dentry and what will they be attached to?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.528 / U:0.836 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site