Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:12:44 -0700 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 |
| |
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 02:03:36AM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote: > > >> > What about fs/reiser4/plugin/node/ and fs/reiser4/plugin/disk_format/? >> > >> > Of course you can implement another filesystem inside the plugins but >> > they wouldn't use fs/reiser4/*.c, so this would be rather stupid. Right? >> > >> >>That was the message of my message. >> >> > >And I think Christophe and me already agreed in this thread that these >upper level plugin facility should go away before merge anyway. We made >the mistake of not requesting removel of that one for XFS and now SGI >blocks it's removal. > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > > > Your arrogance is misplaced for a man who has never done a significant piece of research.
Christoph, we are doing work, you are in the way, get out of the way.
Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |