[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: page fault scalability patch final : i386 tested, x86_64 support added
"David S. Miller" <> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 17:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
> Christoph Lameter <> wrote:
> > That is still 2^(32+12) = 2^44 = 16TB.
> It's actually:
> 2 ^ (31 + PAGE_SHIFT)
> '31' because atomic_t is 'signed' and PAGE_SHIFT should
> be obvious.
> Christoph definitely has a point, this is even more virtual space
> than most of the 64-bit platforms even support. (Sparc64 is
> 2^43 and I believe ia64 is similar)

When can we reasonably expect someone to blow this out of the water?
Within the next couple of years, I suspect?

It does look like we need a new type which is atomic64 on 64-bit and
atomic32 on 32-bit. That could be used to fix the
mmaping-the-same-page-4G-times-kills-the-kernel bug too.

> and this limit actually
> mostly comes from the 3-level page table limits.

This reminds me - where's that 4-level pagetable patch got to?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean