[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: silent semantic changes with reiser4
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 16:50, Christophe Saout wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 26.08.2004, 16:38 -0400 schrieb Lee Revell:
> > > It has always bugged me that Gnome and KDE implement their own VFS layers.
> >
> > Same here. This always seemed like something the kernel should be able
> > to handle. It seems to me that if reiser4 had been available at the
> > time the Gnome and KDE developers would not have needed to do this.
> Well, the kernel doesn't have a filesystem that speaks http, scp and
> those things. GnomeVFS is URL-based. It has some pseudo-protocols that
> extract a pseudo directory-tree for all installed applications + the
> changes the used made, created on the fly from a set of XML files that
> are read-only and system-wide and the user-overridden changes. I don't
> know if all of these things would really make sense inside the kernel.

True. FWIW, I never use most of those features. It's just too damn
slow. Windows seems to implement all of the useful features of
GnomeVFS, and they are 10x faster.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:1.551 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site