lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: silent semantic changes with reiser4
    From
    Date
    On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 16:50, Christophe Saout wrote:
    > Am Donnerstag, den 26.08.2004, 16:38 -0400 schrieb Lee Revell:
    >
    > > > It has always bugged me that Gnome and KDE implement their own VFS layers.
    > >
    > > Same here. This always seemed like something the kernel should be able
    > > to handle. It seems to me that if reiser4 had been available at the
    > > time the Gnome and KDE developers would not have needed to do this.
    >
    > Well, the kernel doesn't have a filesystem that speaks http, scp and
    > those things. GnomeVFS is URL-based. It has some pseudo-protocols that
    > extract a pseudo directory-tree for all installed applications + the
    > changes the used made, created on the fly from a set of XML files that
    > are read-only and system-wide and the user-overridden changes. I don't
    > know if all of these things would really make sense inside the kernel.
    >

    True. FWIW, I never use most of those features. It's just too damn
    slow. Windows seems to implement all of the useful features of
    GnomeVFS, and they are 10x faster.

    Lee

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.020 / U:30.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site