Messages in this thread |  | | From | Denis Vlasenko <> | | Subject | Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 | | Date | Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:34:38 +0300 |
| |
> > > A file is a stream of bytes. > > > > "OMG! It breaks tar and email!!!" argument doesn't fly. Things break all > > the time and are fixed. It's called progress. > > What it breaks is the concept of a file. In ways that are ill-defined, > not portable, hard to work with, and needlessly complex. Along the > way, it breaks every single application that ever thought it knew what > a file was. > > Progress? No, this has been done before. Various dead operating > systems have done it or similar and regretted it. Most recently MacOS, > which jumped through major hurdles to begin purging themselves of > resource forks when they went to OS X. They're still there, but > heavily deprecated. > > > cp, grep, cat, and tar will continue to work just fine on files with > > multiple streams. > > Find some silly person with an iBook and open a shell on OS X. Use cp > to copy a file with a resource fork. Oh look, the Finder has no idea > what the new file is, even though it looks exactly identical in the > shell. Isn't that _wonderful_? Now try cat < a > b on a file with a > fork. How is that ever going to work? > > I like cat < a > b. You can keep your progress.
cat <a >b does not preserve following file properties even on standard UNIX filesystems: name,owner,group,permissions. -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |