Messages in this thread | | | From | Felipe Alfaro Solana <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.9-rc1-mm1 | Date | Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:45:54 +0200 |
| |
On Thursday 26 August 2004 16:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I think the problem is that relatively not so many people run -mm, and even > less people try to use them for a longer time. Also, there sometimes are > some issues with -mm that must be sorted out first, but then there's not > much time left for testing the scheduler before the next -mm.
I think this is the main reason of existence for -mm kernels: find problems, sort them out and fix them. I've been running -mm kernels since 2.5.80+ and all problems I have had were resolved in a timely manner.
What I think is that Con's scheduler is the one that needs to get into -mm kernels to give it more exposure. Currently, it has a very limited audience. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |