Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:20:19 -0700 | From | Roland McGrath <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] notify_parent and ptrace cleanup |
| |
> We should split TASK_STOPPED into two different cases: TASK_STOPPED and > TASK_PTRACED.
Ok. I think this has exactly the same effect as my patches get by introducing checks and invariants relating to last_siginfo. To me that was less ambitious than introducing a new value for the state field, because I am not entirely sure I grok how that is used everywhere. If you think that adding a new TASK_TRACED state will not have lots of gotchas, I am happy to take a crack at it.
Thanks, Roland
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |