lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P9
From
Date
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 23:17, K.R. Foley wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/voluntary-preempt/voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P9
> >

> latency trace of ~148 usec in scsi_request? I don't know if this is real
> or not. Note the 79 usec here:
>
> 00000001 0.107ms (+0.079ms): sd_init_command (scsi_prep_fn)
>
> Entire trace is here:
>
> http://www.cybsft.com/testresults/2.6.8.1-P9/latency_trace7.txt
>
>
> Is this possible? This is not the first time I have seen this. There is
> another one here:
>
> http://www.cybsft.com/testresults/2.6.8.1-P9/latency_trace5.txt
>

This looks like a real latency. What is
/sys/block/sdX/queue/max_sectors_kb set to? Does lowering it help?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans