Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:07:50 +0200 (CEST) | | From | Tim Schmielau <> | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.6.9-rc1 |
| |
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmm.. I have no strong preferences. There _is_ obviously a well-defined > ordering from x.y.z.1 -> x.y.z.2 (unlike the -rcX releases that don't have > any ordering wrt the bugfixes), so either interdiffs or whole new full > diffs are totally "logical". We just have to chose one way or the other, > and I don't actually much care. > > Any reason for your preference?
I'd also vote for the x.y.z.2 to be based on x.y.z, because it's consistent with common practice. Currently all patches that I know of that have an EXTRAVERSION are based on the corresponding kernels with empty EXTRAVERSION. Be it -pre, -rc, -mm, -ac or whatever.
Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |