[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Shouldn't kconfig defaults match recommendations in help text?
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:03:55PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > I'll post such patches in a short while. Sepperate mails, one pr patch
> > changing one kconfig default pr patch.
> One Kconfig file pr. patch makes more sense.
You are right, I'll do that.

Which brings me to another thing regarding configs and defaults - there
does not seem to be much relation between the defaults in the various
Kconfig files and the settings in arch/<foo>/defconfig which puzzles me,
especially since "make defconfig" seems to use the stuff from
arch/<foo>/defconfig and not what's specified in Kconfig...
Wouldn't it make sense to update the defconfig's to match the Kconfig's
when I make these changes?

Jesper Juhl

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.042 / U:34.204 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site