lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Shouldn't kconfig defaults match recommendations in help text?
    On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

    > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 07:03:55PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
    > > I'll post such patches in a short while. Sepperate mails, one pr patch
    > > changing one kconfig default pr patch.
    >
    > One Kconfig file pr. patch makes more sense.
    >
    You are right, I'll do that.

    Which brings me to another thing regarding configs and defaults - there
    does not seem to be much relation between the defaults in the various
    Kconfig files and the settings in arch/<foo>/defconfig which puzzles me,
    especially since "make defconfig" seems to use the stuff from
    arch/<foo>/defconfig and not what's specified in Kconfig...
    Wouldn't it make sense to update the defconfig's to match the Kconfig's
    when I make these changes?

    --
    Jesper Juhl

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.024 / U:0.520 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site