[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RCU issue with SELinux (Re: SELINUX performance issues)
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 03:25, Kaigai Kohei wrote:
> You are right. Indeed, the lock for hash bucket is also necessary
> when avc_insert() is called. I fixed them.

avc_has_perm* can be called from interrupt or bh, e.g. send_sigio or
sock_rcv_skb. So using just spin_lock/spin_unlock rather than
spin_lock_irqsave/restore is unsafe, right?

Stephen Smalley <>
National Security Agency

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.123 / U:9.784 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site