lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: RCU issue with SELinux (Re: SELINUX performance issues)
    From
    Date
    On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 03:25, Kaigai Kohei wrote:
    > You are right. Indeed, the lock for hash bucket is also necessary
    > when avc_insert() is called. I fixed them.

    avc_has_perm* can be called from interrupt or bh, e.g. send_sigio or
    sock_rcv_skb. So using just spin_lock/spin_unlock rather than
    spin_lock_irqsave/restore is unsafe, right?

    --
    Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>
    National Security Agency

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.022 / U:89.540 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site