Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:13:26 +0300 | From | "O.Sezer" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2.4] gcc-3.4 more fixes |
| |
Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:41:46PM +0300, O.Sezer wrote: > >>>>Ozkan, >>>> >>>>This are just warning fixes right? >>>> >>>>I dont like this patches, that is, I'm not confident about them. >>>> >>>>Let the warnings be. >>> >>>For gcc-3.4 they're warnings. For gcc-3.5 they'll cause compiler >>>failures (that's what mikpe says on cset-1.1490, too) >> >>As a side note, almost all of them are in 2.6 anyway (can't >>honestly remember which aren't) > > > Have you nocited the deadly mistake you made I showed with the grep? >
Oopss :/ Than 2.6 has the same deadly thing. I'm too trusting I guess.. The correct thing should be to change "if (!(PRIV(dev) =" into "if (!(dev->phy_data =", right?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |