[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [ACPI] Re: [PATCH] cleanup ACPI numa warnings
On Friday, August 20, 2004 2:55 pm, Alex Williamson wrote:
> I'm not sure where we stand on this, sorry for the delay. To recap,
> the first patch I submitted cleaned up the original functions, but moved
> the ugliness up into multi-line macros. People didn't like the macros
> and suggested static inlines. However, static inlines don't work for
> this application because the debug print needs state setup by the
> ACPI_FUNCTION_NAME call. IMHO, it's not worth setting up that state in
> the static inline function for this little bit of cleanup.
> So, I think we left it at nobody liked the macros and static inlines
> don't work. General unhappiness. Below is a patch that doesn't attempt
> to cleanup the original code, it just adds the #ifdefs and range
> checking w/ no macros. Does this look better? Below is the original
> submit comment outlining the goal. Thanks,

Yes please.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.136 / U:0.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site