[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kernbench on 512p
On Friday, August 20, 2004 11:57 am, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> If I am not too confused, you need #4 and #5 out of Manfred's set of
> five RCU_HUGE patchset. They are at:
> A little work will be required to get them to apply. For example, in
> the first patch, instead of:
> spin_lock(&rcu_state.mutex);
> one would say:
> spin_lock(&rsp->lock);
> due to the addition of the _bh() primitives. The "rcu_ctrlblk."
> and "rcu_state." have been replaced by pointers in order to handle
> multiple different types of grace periods:
> o Traditional grace periods based on context switch, executing
> in user mode, or running the idle loop.
> o New-age low-latency grace periods based on running with
> interrupts enabled.

Looks like a bit more context has changed. Manfred, care to respin against
-mm3 so I can test?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.067 / U:0.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site