[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: kernbench on 512p
    On Friday, August 20, 2004 11:57 am, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
    > If I am not too confused, you need #4 and #5 out of Manfred's set of
    > five RCU_HUGE patchset. They are at:
    > A little work will be required to get them to apply. For example, in
    > the first patch, instead of:
    > spin_lock(&rcu_state.mutex);
    > one would say:
    > spin_lock(&rsp->lock);
    > due to the addition of the _bh() primitives. The "rcu_ctrlblk."
    > and "rcu_state." have been replaced by pointers in order to handle
    > multiple different types of grace periods:
    > o Traditional grace periods based on context switch, executing
    > in user mode, or running the idle loop.
    > o New-age low-latency grace periods based on running with
    > interrupts enabled.

    Looks like a bit more context has changed. Manfred, care to respin against
    -mm3 so I can test?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.020 / U:1.644 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site