[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: PF_MEMALLOC in 2.6

> If you let me gloat for a little bit, ub makes this discussion moot
> because it has no helper thread. But getting back to usb-storage,

But ub supports only a subset of storage devices, doesn't it?

> This is what made me suspect that it's the diry memory writeout problem.
> It's just like how it was on 2.4 before Alan added PF_MEMALLOC.

If we add PF_MEMALLOC, do we solve the issue or make it only less
likely? Isn't there a need to limit users of the reserves in number?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.160 / U:0.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site