Messages in this thread |  | | From | Oliver Neukum <> | Subject | Re: PF_MEMALLOC in 2.6 | Date | Fri, 20 Aug 2004 16:50:07 +0200 |
| |
> If you let me gloat for a little bit, ub makes this discussion moot > because it has no helper thread. But getting back to usb-storage,
But ub supports only a subset of storage devices, doesn't it?
[..] > This is what made me suspect that it's the diry memory writeout problem. > It's just like how it was on 2.4 before Alan added PF_MEMALLOC.
If we add PF_MEMALLOC, do we solve the issue or make it only less likely? Isn't there a need to limit users of the reserves in number?
Regards Oliver - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |