Messages in this thread | | | From | "Robert White" <> | Subject | RE: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY | Date | Mon, 2 Aug 2004 12:44:41 -0700 |
| |
Is there an argument _against_ providing an explicit flush?
-----Original Message----- From: David S. Miller [mailto:davem@redhat.com] Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 7:54 PM To: arjanv@redhat.com Cc: rwhite@casabyte.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:10:06 +0200 Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com> wrote:
> btw do we export MSG_MORE functionality to userspace ? That might be a > solution as well...
Yes, we do.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |