lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY
Date
Is there an argument _against_ providing an explicit flush?


-----Original Message-----
From: David S. Miller [mailto:davem@redhat.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 7:54 PM
To: arjanv@redhat.com
Cc: rwhite@casabyte.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY

On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:10:06 +0200
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com> wrote:

> btw do we export MSG_MORE functionality to userspace ? That might be a
> solution as well...

Yes, we do.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.347 / U:0.856 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site