Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch] Latency Tracer, voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc4-O6 | From | Lee Revell <> | Date | Thu, 19 Aug 2004 06:54:30 -0400 |
| |
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 15:18, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 09:48:26AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > there's another thing you could try: various SHA_CODE_SIZE values in > > drivers/char/random.c. Could you try 1, 2 and 3, does it change the > > overhead as seen in the trace? > > I doubt SHA_CODE_SIZE will make a sufficient difference to avoid the > latency problems.
Correct, the difference is less than 50%. I will try the patch.
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |