[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] voluntary-preempt-
On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 06:38, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 06:29, Lee Revell wrote:
> > Yes, this takes care of it. Now the dominant latency is the 142us
> > latency from the via-rhine driver, which is fixed by using the driver
> > from -mm (specifically it's fixed in bk-netdev.patch).
> >
> OK, this is a new one:

This is the other common one:

preemption latency trace v1.0.1
latency: 74 us, entries: 9 (9)
| task: XFree86/493, uid:0 nice:-10 policy:0 rt_prio:0
=> started at: schedule+0x5b/0x590
=> ended at: schedule+0x2f0/0x590
0.000ms (+0.000ms): schedule (work_resched)
0.000ms (+0.000ms): sched_clock (schedule)
0.001ms (+0.001ms): dequeue_task (schedule)
0.001ms (+0.000ms): recalc_task_prio (schedule)
0.002ms (+0.000ms): effective_prio (recalc_task_prio)
0.002ms (+0.000ms): enqueue_task (schedule)
0.004ms (+0.002ms): __switch_to (schedule)
0.072ms (+0.067ms): finish_task_switch (schedule)
0.073ms (+0.000ms): sub_preempt_count (schedule)

Not sure what to make of this one.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.164 / U:0.644 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site