[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch] voluntary-preempt-

* Lee Revell <> wrote:

> > wli indicated he's working on the pagetable zapping critical section
> > issue - wli?
> In the meantime, can we easily do a touch_preempt_timing() here, to
> disable reporting of this issue, so we can continue to identify
> others? This one is frequent enough that I have not been able to
> identify any more.

yeah, you can add touch_preempt_timing() there. (i'd rather not do it in
the patch, to get real results.) It is safe to add it anywhere in the
source, it only has side-effects on tracing.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.243 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site