lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: kernbench on 512p
Date
On Thursday, August 19, 2004 7:38 pm, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > 41.4% 58.6% 0% rcu_state
> > 61.3% 38.7% 0% __rcu_process_callbacks+0x260
> > 41.4% 58.6% 0% rcu_check_quiescent_state+0xf0
> >
> > So it looks like the dcache lock is the biggest problem on this system
> > with this load. And although the rcu stuff has improved tremendously for
> > this system, it's still highly contended.
>
> Was this run using all of Manfred's RCU patches? If not, it would be
> interesting to see what you get with full RCU_HUGE patchset.

So that stuff isn't in 2.6.8.1-mm1? What I tested was pretty close to a stock
version of that tree. Where can I grab a version of that patchset that
applies to a recent kernel?

Thanks,
Jesse
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.045 / U:0.964 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site