[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: new tool: blktool
Mark Lord wrote:
> >* I don't mind HDIO_DRIVE_TASK nearly as much as HDIO_DRIVE_CMD,
> >* since the command protocol is available.
> That's not HDIO_DRIVE_TASKFILE, by the way.. a different beast there.
> HDIO_DRIVE_TASK is just a slightly different form of HDIO_DRIVE_CMD
> for non-data commands (specifically, some SMART commands),
> with a more complete register set being exchanged.

Oops, indeed I meant HDIO_DRIVE_TASKFILE.

Anyway, once the infrastructure for the ATA Pass-thru CDB is implemented
in libata, it is trivial to implement any of these three HDIO_DRIVE_xxx
ioctls, using the ioctl data to build a scsi command internally. A bit
strange at first glance, but it maximizes the leverage of existing
kernel infrastructure to send commands, time them out, etc.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.038 / U:0.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site