Messages in this thread | | | From | David Mosberger <> | Date | Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:40:20 -0700 | Subject | Re: kernbench on 512p |
| |
>>>>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:37:16 -0400, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> said:
Jesse> On Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:29 pm, David Mosberger wrote: >> >>>>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:16:33 -0400, Jesse Barnes >>>>> >> <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> said: >> Jesse> It would be nice if the patch to show which lock is contended Jesse> got included. >> Why not use q-syscollect? It will show you the caller of >> ia64_spinlock_contention, which is often just as good (or better >> ;-).
Jesse> Because it requires guile and guile SLIB, which I've never Jesse> been able to setup properly on a RHEL3 based distro. Care to Jesse> rewrite the tools in C or something? ;)
Why not file a bug-report to Red Hat instead? guile v1.6 and the guile-SLIB are quite old and rather standard.
Of course, you could also run the analysis on a Debian system, which comes standard with those packages.
--david
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |