Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Aug 2004 09:22:31 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: kernbench on 512p |
| |
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 12:16:33PM -0400, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Here's the kernel profile. It would be nice if the patch to show which lock > is contended got included. I think it was discussed awhile back, but I don't > have one against the newly merged profiling code. > [root@ascender root]# readprofile -m System.map | sort -nr | head -30 > 208218076 total 30.1677 > 90036167 ia64_pal_call_static 468938.3698 > 88140492 default_idle 229532.5312 > 10312592 ia64_save_scratch_fpregs 161134.2500 > 10306777 ia64_load_scratch_fpregs 161043.3906 > 8723555 ia64_spinlock_contention 90870.3646 > 121385 rcu_check_quiescent_state 316.1068 > 40464 file_move 180.6429 > 32374 file_kill 144.5268 > 25316 atomic_dec_and_lock 98.8906 > 24814 clear_page 155.0875 > 17709 file_ra_state_init 110.6813 > 17603 clear_page_tables 13.4169
file_move()? file_kill()? I smell files_lock.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |