[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    Hi all :)

Is there any special reason not to implement setproctitle in the
kernel? In user space is a bit difficult to implement since 'argv[0]'
cannot grow beyond the initially allocated space, better said, it can
grow but only changing the pointer to another place or eating the
space occupied by the other arguments.

proftpd has a not-very-polite set_proc_title that misses the
final NULL, and a couple of other programs out there uses it, too.
Applications should be free to change theirs proc titles to some
pretty if they want, shouldn't they?

In proc/base.c you can read about 'setproctitle(3)', that is, in
library space (user space), not kernel space, but AFAIK only FreeBSD
has setproctitle :?

Thanks in advance :)

Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado

Linux Registered User 88736 &
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.040 / U:15.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site