Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0 | | From | Lee Revell <> | | Date | Sun, 15 Aug 2004 23:18:00 -0400 |
| |
On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 22:58, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> if it doesnt change the xruns then it shows that it's not the locking of > make_pages_present() that interacts with jackd, but it's what it does > that interacts with it (or with the audio driver). > > assuming the DMA-starvation theory isnt excluded via mlock-test2.c:
Sorry, you lost me here. Does the behavior of mlock-test2 point to the locking of make_pages_present interfering with jackd, or with the audio driver?
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |