Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 16 Aug 2004 05:14:20 +0200 | | From | Ingo Molnar <> | | Subject | Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0 |
| |
* Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> > i've attached mlock-test2.cc that should test this theory. The code > > breaks up the mlock-ed region into 8 equal pieces and does mlock() on > > them separately. It's basically a lock-break done in user-space. Does > > this change the nature of xruns? > > This does change the xruns. I have to `mlock-test2 8000' to produce > any xrun at all, and that only produces a 2-300 usec xrun. With > mlockall-test the threshold to produce an xrun was ~1500.
did you try mlock-test.cc too? Just to make sure that mlock-test.cc is equivalent to mlockall-test.cc.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |