Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0 | | From | Lee Revell <> | | Date | Sun, 15 Aug 2004 23:11:41 -0400 |
| |
On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 22:58, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> i've attached mlock-test2.cc that should test this theory. The code > breaks up the mlock-ed region into 8 equal pieces and does mlock() on > them separately. It's basically a lock-break done in user-space. Does > this change the nature of xruns? >
This does change the xruns. I have to `mlock-test2 8000' to produce any xrun at all, and that only produces a 2-300 usec xrun. With mlockall-test the threshold to produce an xrun was ~1500.
Lee
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |