lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0
From
Date
On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 22:58, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> i've attached mlock-test2.cc that should test this theory. The code
> breaks up the mlock-ed region into 8 equal pieces and does mlock() on
> them separately. It's basically a lock-break done in user-space. Does
> this change the nature of xruns?
>

This does change the xruns. I have to `mlock-test2 8000' to produce any
xrun at all, and that only produces a 2-300 usec xrun. With
mlockall-test the threshold to produce an xrun was ~1500.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog