lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0
From
Date
On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 20:25, Florian Schmidt wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 13:56:49 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
> >
> > i've uploaded the -P0 patch:
> >
> > http://redhat.com/~mingo/voluntary-preempt/voluntary-preempt-2.6.8.1-P0
>
> I haven't tried this patch yet, but i have a question regarding the
> mlockall issue:
>
> Jackd also uses IPC mechnisms for remote procedure calls [i think,
> please correct me] and makes heavy use of shared memory. Might
> mlock(all) have influence of this? is jackd maybe producing xruns
> because some IPC stuff blocks when mlockall is used?
>
> I'm just guessing wildly and uneducatedly..

FWIW, mlockall by an unrelated normal-priority process still causes
xruns in the SCHED_FIFO jackd process even when jackd is run with no
clients.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.585 / U:0.184 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site