lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement
    Shailabh writes:
    > But do let us know if there is interest in merging
    > (after this round of clarificatory emails is over) as it will affect
    > which way we go.

    I remain convinced that such a merging would be wrong headed.

    When I examine the experience that other operating systems such as
    Solaris, Unicos and Irix have had with resource share groups and
    cpusets, they have considered these to be two distinct facilities,
    correctly so in my view.

    So I recommend that you not try to bend CKRM to include cpusets.

    Unless others have more to say, I too am content to close this thread
    for now. I've email-bombed enough mail boxes for one week ;).

    I'll have an updated cpuset patch, hopefully next week, hopefully
    with a shorter Cc list this time, with a couple of modest fixes.

    Thank-you.

    --
    I won't rest till it's the best ...
    Programmer, Linux Scalability
    Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.019 / U:0.300 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site