lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: PATCH [2/7] Fix posix locking code
From
Date
På lau , 14/08/2004 klokka 16:00, skreiv Matthew Wilcox:

> I know I said I thought file_lock_operations was the right thing to
> do ... but now I think that this isn't a property of the file_lock so
> much as it is a property of the underlying filesystem. I think putting a
> lock_operations into struct file is maybe a bit much. How about adding
> a lock_operations pointer to file_operations?

Lock operations are as much a property of the lock *type*. A BSD lock
may/will have an entirely different set of callbacks.

Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.934 / U:0.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site