Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Fri, 13 Aug 2004 03:18:34 +0200 | | From | Florian Schmidt <> | | Subject | Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc3-O5 |
| |
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:55:30 -0400 Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> Even if it is not a long non-preemptible section, mlockall-test is > still doing *something* that causes an xrun in jackd. Maybe > interrupts are being disabled for a long time. Whatever it is, it > cannot possibly be a jackd bug, because mlockall by an unrelated, > normal-priority process causes an xrun in the SCHED_FIFO jackd > process.
Hmm, yes, that makes sense. I wonder: does mlockall have any influence on IPC?
Flo
-- Palimm Palimm! http://affenbande.org/~tapas/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |