Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:23:38 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][2.6] Completely out of line spinlocks / i386 |
| |
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 12:20:58AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > Okay, the results on 2.6.8-rc4 (COOL had a bit of porting, basically > dropping the hunks associated with spin_lock_flags_string or whatever > it is). Chose the .config largely to be vaguely deterministic, but had > to nuke the "System is too big" check in arch/x86_64/boot/tools/build.c. > > text data bss dec hex filename > mainline: 20708323 6603052 1878448 29189823 1bd66bf vmlinux > cool: 20619594 6588166 1878448 29086208 1bbd200 vmlinux > C-func: 19969264 6583128 1878384 28430776 1b1d1b8 vmlinux > x86-64, -O2, allyesconfig minus the following: [...]
The precise COOL patch used:
Index: spinlock-2.6.8-rc4/arch/x86_64/Kconfig =================================================================== --- spinlock-2.6.8-rc4.orig/arch/x86_64/Kconfig 2004-06-15 22:19:44.000000000 -0700 +++ spinlock-2.6.8-rc4/arch/x86_64/Kconfig 2004-08-11 22:24:47.944933072 -0700 @@ -436,6 +436,16 @@ best used in conjunction with the NMI watchdog so that spinlock deadlocks are also debuggable. +config COOL_SPINLOCK + bool "Completely out of line spinlocks" + depends on SMP + default y + help + Say Y here to build spinlocks which have common text for contended + and uncontended paths. This reduces kernel text size by at least + 50k on most configurations, plus there is the additional benefit + of better cache utilisation. + # !SMP for now because the context switch early causes GPF in segment reloading # and the GS base checking does the wrong thing then, causing a hang. config CHECKING Index: spinlock-2.6.8-rc4/arch/x86_64/kernel/x8664_ksyms.c =================================================================== --- spinlock-2.6.8-rc4.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/x8664_ksyms.c 2004-08-10 23:00:19.712651608 -0700 +++ spinlock-2.6.8-rc4/arch/x86_64/kernel/x8664_ksyms.c 2004-08-11 22:24:47.944933072 -0700 @@ -218,3 +218,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(flush_tlb_all); #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_COOL_SPINLOCK +extern void asmlinkage __spin_lock_failed(spinlock_t *); +extern void asmlinkage __spin_lock_failed_flags(spinlock_t *, unsigned long); +extern void asmlinkage __spin_lock_loop(spinlock_t *); +extern void asmlinkage __spin_lock_loop_flags(spinlock_t *, unsigned long); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__spin_lock_failed); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__spin_lock_failed_flags); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__spin_lock_loop); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__spin_lock_loop_flags); +#endif + Index: spinlock-2.6.8-rc4/arch/x86_64/lib/Makefile =================================================================== --- spinlock-2.6.8-rc4.orig/arch/x86_64/lib/Makefile 2004-06-15 22:18:59.000000000 -0700 +++ spinlock-2.6.8-rc4/arch/x86_64/lib/Makefile 2004-08-11 22:25:22.127736496 -0700 @@ -12,3 +12,4 @@ lib-y += memcpy.o memmove.o memset.o copy_user.o lib-$(CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK) += dec_and_lock.o +lib-$(CONFIG_COOL_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o Index: spinlock-2.6.8-rc4/arch/x86_64/lib/spinlock.c =================================================================== --- spinlock-2.6.8-rc4.orig/arch/x86_64/lib/spinlock.c 2004-04-06 10:56:48.000000000 -0700 +++ spinlock-2.6.8-rc4/arch/x86_64/lib/spinlock.c 2004-08-11 22:24:47.945932920 -0700 @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +#define PROC(name) \ + ".align 4\n" \ + ".globl " #name"\n" \ + #name":\n" + +asm (PROC(__spin_lock_failed_flags) + "test $0x200, %rbx\n" + "jz 1f\n" + "sti\n" + "1:\n\t" + "rep; nop\n" + "cmpb $0, (%rax)\n" + "jle 1b\n" + "cli\n" + "lock; decb (%rax)\n\t" + "js __spin_lock_failed_flags\n\t" + "nop\n" + "ret\n" +); + +asm (PROC(__spin_lock_loop_flags) + "lock; decb (%rax)\n\t" + "js 1f\n\t" + "nop\n\t" + "ret\n\t" + "1:\n\t" + "test $0x200, %rbx\n\t" + "jz 1f\n\t" + "sti\n\t" + "2: rep; nop\n\t" + "cmpb $0, (%rax)\n\t" + "jle 2b\n\t" + "cli\n\t" + "jmp __spin_lock_loop_flags\n\t" +); + +asm (PROC(__spin_lock_failed) + "rep; nop\n\t" + "cmpb $0, (%rax)\n\t" + "jle __spin_lock_failed\n\t" + "lock; decb (%rax)\n\t" + "js __spin_lock_failed\n\t" + "nop\n\t" + "ret\n\t" +); + +asm (PROC(__spin_lock_loop) + "lock; decb (%rax)\n\t" + "js 1f\n\t" + "nop\n\t" + "ret\n\t" + "1: rep; nop\n\t" + "cmpb $0, (%rax)\n\t" + "jle 1b\n\t" + "jmp __spin_lock_loop\n\t" +); + Index: spinlock-2.6.8-rc4/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h =================================================================== --- spinlock-2.6.8-rc4.orig/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h 2004-06-15 22:20:04.000000000 -0700 +++ spinlock-2.6.8-rc4/include/asm-x86_64/spinlock.h 2004-08-11 22:24:47.945932920 -0700 @@ -43,6 +43,13 @@ #define spin_unlock_wait(x) do { barrier(); } while(spin_is_locked(x)) #define _raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, flags) _raw_spin_lock(lock) +#ifdef CONFIG_COOL_SPINLOCK +#define spin_lock_string \ + "call __spin_lock_loop\n\t" + +#define spin_lock_string_flags \ + "call __spin_lock_loop_flags\n\t" +#else #define spin_lock_string \ "\n1:\t" \ "lock ; decb %0\n\t" \ @@ -54,6 +61,7 @@ "jle 2b\n\t" \ "jmp 1b\n" \ LOCK_SECTION_END +#endif /* * This works. Despite all the confusion. @@ -122,7 +130,12 @@ #endif __asm__ __volatile__( spin_lock_string - :"=m" (lock->lock) : : "memory"); +#ifdef CONFIG_COOL_SPINLOCK + : : "a" (&lock->lock) : "memory" +#else + :"=m" (lock->lock) : : "memory" +#endif + ); } - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |