Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:15:51 -0700 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks |
| |
* Greg KH (greg@kroah.com) wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 09:23:19PM -0400, James Morris wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Kurt Garloff wrote: > > > > > The rest of the path is still a win IMVHO. > > > > > > Unfortunately, it has not been discussed here yet. > > > > Defaulting to the capability module is a separate discussion. I > > personally don't have a strong opinion on this issue. > > > > Chris, Stephen, Greg? :-) > > I don't really care. But I think almost every LSM module so far really > wants the capabilities module at the same time, right? Maybe we should > make it easier to do that than what is necessary today.
Yes, we should.
thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |