[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 09:23:19PM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Kurt Garloff wrote:
> > The rest of the path is still a win IMVHO.
> >
> > Unfortunately, it has not been discussed here yet.
> Defaulting to the capability module is a separate discussion. I
> personally don't have a strong opinion on this issue.
> Chris, Stephen, Greg? :-)

I don't really care. But I think almost every LSM module so far really
wants the capabilities module at the same time, right? Maybe we should
make it easier to do that than what is necessary today.


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.050 / U:0.736 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site