[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: architectures with their own "config PCMCIA"
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:45:21PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:

> Hi,

Hi Roman,

> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Roman, is it intentional that PCMCIA!=n is true if there's no PCMCIA
> > option, or is it simply a bug?
> Yes, undefined symbols have a (string) value of "" . Maybe it's time to
> add a warning for such comparisons...

is there any strong reason why undefined symbols aren't equivalent to
symbols with a value of "n"?

Many !=n seems to be bogus (especially ones from the automatic
transition to the new Kconfig) and I'll audit them. But rewriting valid
FOO!=n to (FOO=y || FOO=m) doesn't sound like an improvement.

> bye, Roman



"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.057 / U:7.668 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site