lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:12:17PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> * James Morris (jmorris@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Chris Wright wrote:
> > > Is this new (i.e. you just did this)? It's basically the same result we
> > > had from a few years ago.
> >
> > Yes, did it today.
>
> Thanks, James. Since these are the only concrete numbers and they are
> in the noise, I see no compelling reason to change to unlikely().

Well, you may want to drop the unlikely if you dislike it.
The rest of the path is still a win IMVHO.

Unfortunately, it has not been discussed here yet.

Reards,
--
Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de> [Koeln, DE]
Physics:Plasma modeling <garloff@plasimo.phys.tue.nl> [TU Eindhoven, NL]
Linux: SUSE Labs (Head) <garloff@suse.de> [SUSE Nuernberg, DE]
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.129 / U:1.536 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site