Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:23:45 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others) |
| |
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:21:43PM -0700, spaminos-ker@yahoo.com wrote: > I am not very familiar with all the parameters, so I just kept the defaults > Anything else I could try? > Nicolas
No. It appeared that the SPA bits had sufficient fairness in them to pass this test but apparently not quite enough.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |