[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Kurt Garloff wrote:

> * Even with selinux=0 and capability loaded, the kernel takes a
> few percents in networking benchmarks (measured by HP on ia64);
> this is caused by the slowliness of indirect jumps on ia64.

Is this just an ia64 issue? If so, then perhaps we should look at only
penalising ia64? Otherwise, loading an LSM module is going to cause
expensive false unlikely() on _every_ LSM hook.

- James
James Morris

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.059 / U:1.496 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site