lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:45:06 +0200 (CEST)
Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:

> >From: Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>
>
> >> Switching Burn-Proof on will reduce the quality of the CDs.
>
> >BTW is it true that Burn-Proof reduces the quality exactly in the cases
> >where burning without Burn-Proof would ruin the disk?
>
> This is why it is silly to tell people that they do not need locked memory
> and raised scheduling priority for CD/DVD writing.

Please, if you don't want to answer the original question, don't post anything.


My answer:
Yes, burn-proof (or however the vendor calls the corresponding feature) saves
your disk where otherwise you run into dead-end. That's what it was meant to
be. When there is no underrun, burn-proof should not do any harm.

Regards,
Stephan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.031 / U:3.980 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site