Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:51:26 +0200 | From | Stephan von Krawczynski <> | Subject | Re: PATCH: cdrecord: avoiding scsi device numbering for ide devices |
| |
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:45:06 +0200 (CEST) Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> >From: Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz> > > >> Switching Burn-Proof on will reduce the quality of the CDs. > > >BTW is it true that Burn-Proof reduces the quality exactly in the cases > >where burning without Burn-Proof would ruin the disk? > > This is why it is silly to tell people that they do not need locked memory > and raised scheduling priority for CD/DVD writing.
Please, if you don't want to answer the original question, don't post anything.
My answer: Yes, burn-proof (or however the vendor calls the corresponding feature) saves your disk where otherwise you run into dead-end. That's what it was meant to be. When there is no underrun, burn-proof should not do any harm.
Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |