[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fix gcc 3.4 inlining errors in drivers/scsi/dc395x.c
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 02:02:50PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >
> > drivers/scsi/dc395x.c fails to build in 2.6.8-rc2-mm1 with gcc 3.4.0 with
> > the following errors :
> >
> > drivers/scsi/dc395x.c: In function `dc395x_handle_interrupt':
> > drivers/scsi/dc395x.c:388: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'enable_msgout_abort': function body not available
> > drivers/scsi/dc395x.c:1740: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
> >
> > drivers/scsi/dc395x.c: In function `msgin_set_async':
> > drivers/scsi/dc395x.c:394: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'set_xfer_rate': function body not available
> > drivers/scsi/dc395x.c:2677: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
> >
> > The patch below fixes the build by un-inlining the functions (an
> > alternative would be to rework the file so the functions move before their
> > first use). As for 'set_xfer_rate' the function itself was not declared
> > inline, only the prototype.
> >...
> Jamie Lenehan already ACK'ed a similar patch I sent two weeks ago which
> moves enable_msgout_abort instead of un-inlining it.
Ohh, OK, I did a search in my lkml mailbox before sending off the patch,
guess I missed it.

Since you already did a bunch of these I'm trying to avoid sending patches
for the ones you alrady did, but a few might slip. Just trying to fill in
the remaining blanks :)

> Both approaches are feasible, it's up to the maintainers to decide which
> one is better in this case.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.036 / U:3.644 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site