Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 1 Aug 2004 07:28:18 -0400 (EDT) | | From | Ingo Molnar <> | | Subject | Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc2-M5 |
| |
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Lee Revell wrote:
> Results with 2.6.8-rc2-M5: > > Configuration max usecs > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > All IRQs threaded 370 > Soundcard IRQ not threaded 335 > Soundcard IRQ not threaded + max_sectors_kb -> 64 161 > > So, it looks like the added configurability does add some overhead - 161 > usecs vs. 50. [...]
+110 usecs is too much to be explained by redirection and configurability overhead. The configurability overhead is near zero.
could you try to repeat the '50 usecs' test with -L2 [that was the one you used?] to make sure it's repeatable? The latencies of -L2 and -M5 should be near identical. The configurability should at most cause a 1-2 usecs overhead - definitely not two orders of magnitude higher. So if there's a difference then i must have degraded one of the latency reduction changes between L2 and M5.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |