lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [2.6 patch] net/hamachi.c: remove bogus inline at function prototype (fwd)
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:

>
> FYI:
> The patch forwarded below is still required in 2.6.8-rc2-mm1.
>
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> -----
>
> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:52:56 +0200
> From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
> To: jgarzik@pobox.com
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [2.6 patch] net/hamachi.c: remove bogus inline at function prototype
>
> Trying to compile drivers/net/hamachi.c in 2.6.8-rc1-mm1 using gcc 3.4
> results in the folloeing compile error:
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> ...
> CC drivers/net/hamachi.o
> drivers/net/hamachi.c: In function `hamachi_interrupt':
> drivers/net/hamachi.c:562: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call
> to 'hamachi_rx': function body not available
> drivers/net/hamachi.c:1402: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
> make[2]: *** [drivers/net/hamachi.o] Error 1
>
> <-- snip -->
>
>
> The inline at the prototype is bogus since the function itself is not
> marked as inline.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
>
> --- linux-2.6.7-mm6-full-gcc3.4/drivers/net/hamachi.c.old 2004-07-09 00:28:31.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.7-mm6-full-gcc3.4/drivers/net/hamachi.c 2004-07-09 00:30:18.000000000 +0200
> @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@
> static void hamachi_init_ring(struct net_device *dev);
> static int hamachi_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev);
> static irqreturn_t hamachi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_instance, struct pt_regs *regs);
> -static inline int hamachi_rx(struct net_device *dev);
> +static int hamachi_rx(struct net_device *dev);
> static inline int hamachi_tx(struct net_device *dev);
> static void hamachi_error(struct net_device *dev, int intr_status);
> static int hamachi_close(struct net_device *dev);
>

Wouldn't it make sense to also un-inline hamachi_tx? both the _rx and _tx
functions are quite big - are they really suitable to be inlined?

Here's a proposed patch against 2.6.8-rc2-mm1

Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>

diff -up linux-2.6.8-rc2-mm1-orig/drivers/net/hamachi.c linux-2.6.8-rc2-mm1/drivers/net/hamachi.c
--- linux-2.6.8-rc2-mm1-orig/drivers/net/hamachi.c 2004-07-31 13:12:52.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc2-mm1/drivers/net/hamachi.c 2004-08-01 13:18:43.000000000 +0200
@@ -559,8 +559,8 @@ static void hamachi_tx_timeout(struct ne
static void hamachi_init_ring(struct net_device *dev);
static int hamachi_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev);
static irqreturn_t hamachi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_instance, struct pt_regs *regs);
-static inline int hamachi_rx(struct net_device *dev);
-static inline int hamachi_tx(struct net_device *dev);
+static int hamachi_rx(struct net_device *dev);
+static int hamachi_tx(struct net_device *dev);
static void hamachi_error(struct net_device *dev, int intr_status);
static int hamachi_close(struct net_device *dev);
static struct net_device_stats *hamachi_get_stats(struct net_device *dev);
@@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ static int hamachi_open(struct net_devic
return 0;
}

-static inline int hamachi_tx(struct net_device *dev)
+static int hamachi_tx(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct hamachi_private *hmp = dev->priv;


/Jesper Juhl

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans