lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 0xdeadbeef vs 0xdeadbeefL
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 02:55:01AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2004, Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org> wrote:
>
> > Which means 0xdeadbeef is a perfectly valid literal for an unsigned int.
>
> Assuming ints are 32-bits wide.

ITYM "at least 32-bits wide".

> They don't have to be. They could be
> as narrow as 16 bits, in which case

... you would have no fscking chance to build Linux kernel on such platform
for $BIGNUM reasons.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.159 / U:0.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site